Despite Kerry's steady silence on copyright issues, we can surface a few outlines. Ed Felten argues:
The fact is that the record of Kerry, and the Democrats in general, on the copyright/innovation issue is not good at all. Consider, for instance, the 2002 Senate hearing on the Hollings CBDTPA, in which Intel's Les Vadasz faced a phalanx of entertainment-industry witnesses. According to Declan McCullagh's Wired News story, the committee's Democrats, including Kerry, spoke in favor of the dangerous CBDTPA bill, while Republicans were more skeptical. (I attended the hearing, and my memory is consistent with Declan's story.)
A discussant on Lessig's blog
quotes from an old, cached page on Kerry's sit :
Copyright-Based Industries Are Critical to Economic Growth: Products of the mind from
America’s scientists, engineers, computer programmers have little value without
intellectual property protections. Copyright based industries alone now account for
nearly 6% of all jobs in America and 7.75 % of GDP. These industries are in jeopardy
because of the Bush Administration’s failure to enforce international treaties to protect
America’s creative community from piracy.
Stop Intellectual Piracy: The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative estimates that
losses theft of U.S. intellectual property in 51 foreign countries total $9.7 billion. In
China alone we lose $1.8 billion to piracy. Yet even where we have strong agreements,
piracy remains a major problem due to a failure to fully implement the TRIPS
agreement and an unwillingness or inability to crack down on the problem. A Kerry
Administration will take theft of the jobs of America’s creative workforce a trade and
foreign policy priority.
Looks like his established approaches to jobs and prosecution could drive a thick copyright policy. Back to the Clinton years, which gave us DMCA and copyright term extensions? Good for some business models, but bad for librarians, students, teachers, some business, and chunks of culture.
Recent Comments