Jon Udell offers a good video screencast of using del.icio.us. It features a sample case of using that web service to hone metadata, find more information, and think about folksonomies and the semantic web's possibilities. Udell lets the video demonstrate how this stuff works in practice. He's also careful to show criticism, while remaining generally optimistic.
Two problems occur to me, upon review this screencast. First, the question of scaling. We see Jon work on a few tags, react to a small group of people, make a couple of contacts, and reexamine his swarm of links. Given that this is a very tiny piece of cyberculture, how does it scale up? Propagating the correction of tags seems likely to generate large swathes of people with different tagschemes, unlikely to change their tagging for reasons of comfort and habit. Will such segmentation persist?
A second problem is the old metadata one of energy. There is some ludic delight in tagging, finding other people, seeing new items bubble up on the delicious main page, and watching some others grow in citation. But will this persist for individual users, or grow in social networks? Will people continue to refine their tagging when it isn't fun any longer? If not, will the tag schemes ossify or grow stale?
These two related problems seem as significant as the death by spam issue.
(thanks to Hugh Blackmer)
Recent Comments