This Huffington post offers a good example of social media anxiety. Leeat Granek advises us to reconnect with people in order to feel better. Lonely people feel sad. Which isn't a shocking bit of news.
What's interesting to Infocult is the way she blames social media for loneliness.
We order take-out, shop online, drive our private cars, and have our groceries delivered, all in the name of "saving time."
Granek doesn't offer evidence for this model, nor does she stop to wonder if social media sometimes connect people offline. She does describe the ultimate costs:
Granek - excuse me, Dr. Leeat Granek, PhD, as she describes herself - touches on other causes for social isolation besides Web 2.0, briefly:
Yet the cultures of work and self-image never appear again in the piece. Calls for cultural change or political activism might be expected here. Perhaps a shout out to Situationism. Instead all we get is a cheery call to talk to other people.
How much easier to step away from the keyboard (or the Huffingtons?) than to participate in social critique!
There's a parallel here to blaming movies or computer games for social problems, easier by far than acually working on cultural transformation. Granek even follows that genre by evoking children (in the saccharine opening paragraphs).
There's also a parallel to medicalization of cyberfear with "internat addiction." Note the way Granek emphasizes her credentials, and offers no sign of scholarly controversy. What she describes comes across as objective truth, rather than an argument.
...which is odd, given some weird observations in the rest of the piece:
(Really? Who is this "we"?)
(Since when? Where is this? Are there no alternatives?)
Watch for more of this Putnam lite type of argument as social media continues to grow, and especially as the economy grinds down.
Recent Comments