It only took three days, but someone finally figured out how to blame the Oslo killings on cyberspace. Thomas Eriksen makes the fearsome internet case.
He leads off with two main targets:
Anders Behring Breivik's world view seems to have been shaped by online fantasy games and the anti-Islamist blogosphere
Those are also the more lyrical "darker waters of the blogosphere ". Alas, the gaming bit fades out as the article proceeds.
Eriksen sees these one or two technologies as yielding one interesting explanation for the attacks, as the villains have allegedly cooked up "a recipe for national fragmentation." An interesting twist on the fearsome internet theme, this views technologies as politically troubling.
The specifically antinationalist charge has precedents, of course, going back to Barlow's 1996 "weary giants". The internet lets us go around nineteenth-century nationalisms bulked out in 20th-century powers, runs the thought. Perhaps we've been dwelling in cyberspace long enough for nostalgia to peep forth.
Within that large-scale framework of shambling nationalisms, Eriksen can then avoid addressing the mental illness argument, or the random lone gunman case. Breivik isn't a person so much as a Randian emlematic character. Breivik's attacks are a symptom of something larger. Something worse and more comfortably disliked:
This is exactly what happened with Breivik and many of his co-believers: they developed a parallel reality on the internet.
Now we're on different ground, the filter bubble/decoherence line of thought. It's targeted at specific media. Blogs, you see, are really the problem. Why,
had he instead been forced to receive his information through a broadsheet newspaper, where not all the stories dealt with Europe's loss of confidence and the rise of militant Islam, it is conceivable that his world would have looked slightly different
Yes, if only those meddlesome kids the internet hadn't smacked down broadcast journalism, there would be fewer mass killings.
Compare with this Reuters article, which focuses on the role of the internet in the lives of lone gunmen. Here the author finds not national coherence in trouble, but simply very isolated and unusual individuals, who - rarely - become violent.
(images from Wikipedia)
Recent Comments