Maybe that upsurge in internet fear we mentioned yesterday won't come about. The anti-porn leader now says he intended something other than what he wrote:
Today, he claimed, “We are not calling for a nationwide band [sic] on pornography,” and that the pledge is really intended “to imply opposition to women being forced into pornography or prostitution.”
What made the difference, conversations with lawyers, or rebellion from staff?
A nationwide band on pornography? Like Traci Lords' techno CD from the 90's?
Posted by: Pete Naegele | July 09, 2011 at 15:33
once the building is severely damaged
Posted by: Andy | July 11, 2011 at 03:31