In mid flashmob panic, CNN suddenly catches its breath. Maybe - just maybe - the internet is not to blame. And maybe censorship isn't the answer to crime.
"It's very difficult to enforce something that's unconstitutional," Jackson said in an interview with CNN. "To make a criminal activity of just having a conversation, whether some acts of criminal activity are associated with it or not, it goes beyond reason."
The mayor of a major American city just remembered that the First Amendment is still there.
His council forgot, for a while, perhaps inspired by Britain's prime minister. Then councilors had a memory attack:
Cleveland City Council unanimously passed legislation that would criminalize the use of Facebook, Twitter and other social media for assembling unruly crowds or encouraging people to commit a crime.
But [Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson], after consulting with advisers, defied the council and vetoed the ordinance -- his first use of that power as mayor...
Jackson suggested that the "emergency measure," as it was described in official records, was perhaps fueled more by emotion than by reason. And on Wednesday, the council members reversed course and voted 14-2 to side with the mayor.
Not only did CNN report this in a non-sarcastic way, but they also ran an anti-censorshop column by Douglass Rushkoff.
Other media sources might be taking a similar, realistic, Constitutional direction. The Christian Science Monitor carried such a report a few days ago. Philly.com reported that police dismissed social media causes for some local flashmobs. Perhaps the social media<->flashmob meme is being throttled back, or will stop entirely.
Hopefully journalists will check with Howard Rheingold for his thoughts, since he's been working on the topic for a long, thoughtful time.
(link via Annette, Todd Bryant, and other Infocult confidential informants; photo from compujeramey)
Recent Comments