A child is murdered, and Skype was involved! Or so mutters the BBC.
Skype child death
In a very strange article, the Beeb describes an appaling act of child-killing by parents, which seems to have involved technology... not at all.
Compare these two paragraphs:
A British man has been interviewed by police investigating the death of a little girl in Norway while the child's mother was talking to him on Skype.
Yasmin Chaudhry was arrested by police in Oslo after her 20-month-old daughter died after being plunged into a bucket of water in October 2010.
What was more important, Skype or that bucket? The visual conversation or the tangible violence?
If you read further, other nontechnological issues surface. The two parents were immigrants from (presumably) Muslim-majority nations, always an issue in northern Europe. The question of physical discipline arises. Competing legal systems. All of that gets set aside in favor of Skype.
Shouldn't the bucket play a role, if we're looking at implements? Put another way, would the article have named a landline telephone if that's how the murderous pair communicated?
(thanks to Todd Bryant)
Recent Comments